There are a large number of sites on the market that utilize the term “future” inside their domain title, but are they futurist-type sites? It is recommended often by printing writers and authors that the phrase “future” is a great term to used in brands, as it holds people’s attention. But, when people utilize the term potential and then do not give predictions or potential records, then are they deceiving the person and web-surfer. I think they are.
Lately, a manager of the next of points type site asked me to write a column, in researching the internet site I found it to be underwhelming on the innovative side, and more heavy to the medical information arena. Indeed, if the journal is serious about “The Future” then why are the articles about new medical innovations in the present time or occurring today? – asked me.
It appears like they’re serious about medical finding that has presently occurred, not what’ll maintain the future. That is just boring, more research information, regurgitation, the common individual approach of re-packaging information. I think they can do better, but are keeping themselves right back, afraid to make people think, worried that you will get past an acceptable limit from your mainstream, quote “core” number of visitors, which I think they cannot even understand. naija news
Needless to say, as an entrepreneur, I am aware of why they get it done that way. It is because they would like to generate income and thus sink to less amount of readership, while however pretending to fairly share the future of stuff. When the manager thought to defend such comments, the indication was that your website was primarily about medical news.
Yes, I realize that your website is certainly caused by an information site and I ask what does which have related to the future of stuff? Shouldn’t the internet site be named NSIN.com or anything that way; for New Science Advancement News? If your website is about Science News and is an accumulation of everyone else’s information, then it is just a duplicate site of a category that is presently used and not unique. Ergo, this content is thus the same, so even if the articles are prepared more clearly and simpler to comprehend, that will be nice, however, what’s the value to a “research information junky” as you will find not many articles on the webpage compared making use of their competition?
Should they name themselves an information site, then you could have “futurist type columnists” anyhow, who might project these medical information things into the future or they might keep carefully the “Potential Stuff” motif and promote the futurist columnists?
This should be a lesson to all “Futuristic” type sites as an incident study. If you take the future thinkers to your site and have nothing to show them, they’ll leave. If you are using trickery to obtain regular viewers there, you are performing a serious disservice to the future of mankind, by selling present inventions since they be all conclusion all. In either case, it’s dishonest to use this approach on potential points-type websites.