On 20-21 July, the cause committee in the European Parliament (EP), the Legal Affairs Committee, may election on its Record on Trademark in the Electronic Single Market Directive. This election is vital to ensure that in the near future we will have a way to enjoy the net, as we know and use it today. In order to save yourself your online we have to convince the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) before 20 July to erase the Report 13 censorship unit in this trademark directive. That’s why you’ll need to behave now: e-mail, contact or tweet using our instruments to your national MEPs, to convince them to push back against Report 13 and to contact in it to inspire their colleagues to join the fight.

We’ll fleetingly put down below what’s at stake when we fail to stop Report 13, what their state of enjoy is with regards to the task, and why we think that your style may have a real impact.

What’s at stake when we fail to stop Article Thirteen
Simply speaking: Report 13 may impose common censorship of all the content you share online, be it a parody video, a remix, a meme, a post, remarks on Reddit, a bit of signal, livestreaming your gaming experience, or perhaps a link in a tweet. As Techdirt put it: Forget The GDPR, The EU’s New Trademark Proposal Can Be A Complete And Total Disaster For The Internet.

Background: In September 2016, the European Commission (EC) introduced in this directive a proposal, Report 13, which will need all internet platforms to filter all user-uploaded content to be able to detect probable trademark infringements. In doing this, the EC has tried to please some major rightholders, especially from the audio industry. However, this requirement would not be restricted to audio or films being transferred, but might protect all types of content that imaginable and affect most of the companies that you use to generally share content. This filtering may prevent your content from ever being available, that’ll successfully develop a censorship unit allowing big organizations to regulate what we see and do online. Your electronic rights and freedom of expression online are thus below threat.

What’s the state-of-play
Simply speaking: The EU nations, with some conditions (not that numerous, but it’s still essential as that means they could still set up a battle later), agreed to support an edition of Report 13 that’s much worse compared to the EC’s original proposal. In parallel, the discussions taking devote the European Parliament prior to the 20-21 July election will also be heading in the incorrect direction. That’s why we truly need one to urgently reach out to MEPs to ensure that we stop this censorship madness before it’s also late. Essentially: the European Parliament is the only real position as of this stage wherever good sense can be built to prevail.

Background – EU Places: On 25 Might, the Ambassadors of the EU nations agreed to support an edition of Report 13 that’s much worse compared to the EC’s original proposal. Some EU nations didn’t fully support the method taken, particularly Belgium, Finland, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands and Slovenia. Now, the EU nations are looking forward to the EP to have a position to be able to begin negotiations between both institutions on one last comprise during trilogues, which should take devote the next 1 / 2 of 2018.

Background – EP: The EP has been debating this apply for quite a long time, and each new bargain proposal of Report 13 that’s being set forward by the cause MEP, or Rapporteur, in the JURI Committee, MEP Axel Voss, is producing more and more problems rather than increasing it. Though, deleting Report 13 remains the best solution, the EP’s Inner Market and Customer Protection (IMCO) and Civil Liberties, Justice and House Affairs (LIBE) Committees have followed Thoughts that severely increase the language of Report 13 and make sure that filtering requirement is removed.

How your style may have an impact
Simply speaking: Not all MEPs are helpful of the EP’s direction on Report 13, many more are not also aware of what’s planning on since they are maybe not sitting in the main element Committees. Therefore, not absolutely all is lost yet, and your style may have a real impact. Reaching out to your national MEPs in your own language, by phone, e-mail or tweet through our instruments, can help get their interest on this matter, and cause them to become push back and erase Report 13 before it’s also late. It can also be essential which they reach out to their colleagues and convince them to join this struggle! Along with your support we could affect the JURI Committee to boost the EP’s discussion position prior to the trilogue discussions with the EU Places (that’s once the 3 EU institutions remain around the desk to get a final deal).

Background: The majority of MEPs fit in with a political teams in the European Parliament, and whilst a few of these teams are obviously in favor of the Report 13 censorship unit, particularly the EPP and ENF teams, most other political parties are split on this matter, as you can see in the desk below. Even if some primary MEPs are resisting the push from the EPP Rapporteur and his class for this censorship unit, regrettably, they don’t also have the total support of the other MEPs from their group. Therefore, your style may have a real impact. Reaching out to your national MEPs in your own language, by phone, e-mail or tweet using our instruments, can help get their interest on this matter, and cause them to become push back and erase Report 13 before it’s also late. It can also be essential which they reach out to their colleagues and convince them to join this struggle! Along with your support we could affect the JURI Committee to boost the EP’s discussion position prior to the trilogue discussions with the EU Places (that’s once the three EU institutions remain around the desk to get a final deal).